Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules

Name: Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules
Author: Frans Van Eemeren

by Frans Van Eemeren · 1 review · 2010

Reviewed by	Journal	Date	Access
Dale Hample	Argumentation: An International Journal on Reasoning	2010-08-01	Restricted

Epistemology & Philosophy of Mind Applied & Professional Ethics

Also by Van Eemeren

Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse, Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation (3 reviews)
Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective (2 reviews)
Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical Studies About Argumentative Discourse in Context (2 reviews)
Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory (2 reviews)
Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof og Argumentation Analysis (2 reviews)
Handbook of Argumentation Theory (2 reviews)
Pondering on Problems of Argumentation: Twenty Essays on Theoretical Issues (2 reviews)
Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory (2 reviews)

Search PhilReviews for this title